The score has no basis
A number is copied without its method, denominator or actual control evidence.
General manufacturing core · assessed practice
FMEA and
Control Plans
Connect credible failures to controls people can carry out.
A risk row looks reassuring. The instruction says something else. The inspection does not fit the shift. Build a linked draft your team can review before paperwork becomes an unsupported release decision.
Try the worked exampleTry the real first lesson
Six modules, original fictional records and a linked working pack. Read the assessment and service terms below before enrolling.
The decision you learn to defend
Review, revise
or hold.
Produce six traceable records, with evidence, uncertainty and actual human authority.
All teaching records and the T1 scale are fictional. This core does not promise full automotive, aerospace or medical-device conformity.
FMEA and Control Plans
A completed spreadsheet can hide a broken control.
The action is only planned
A purchase order or revised document is mistaken for a control that has been implemented and tested.
The reaction leaves people guessing
Affected work, safe response, escalation or restart authority is missing. That can create preventable escapes, rework and inconsistent decisions.
FMEA and Control Plans
For the person maintaining the risk/control chain.
Who it is for
Quality, manufacturing and process engineers, supervisors and cross-functional team members. Read a simple process flow/specification and use basic arithmetic. No coding or special FMEA software is required.
Know the scope before you buy
This is practical manufacturing PFMEA-to-Control-Plan work. It introduces DFMEA responsibility as a contrast. It does not replace licensed customer/sector tables, full device risk management, acceptance-sampling expertise or actual authorization.
FMEA and Control Plans
The check is named. Can it actually run?
Fictional worked example. Larkspur’s Op20 bore must be12.000–12.020 mm under its supplied drawing. The initial PFMEA cites a subjective visual check. A proposed gauge is not installed. The draft plan and instruction conflict.
240seconds/hour of proposed check work
180seconds/hour available
60seconds/hour unresolved shortfall
Three checks at 80 seconds require 240 seconds. RPN36 does not approve that workload. The case’s last valid check ends at unit 120; unit 144 is latest. Under the supplied reaction rule, the initial suspect set is121–144, or24 units, subject to the stated traceability and valid-check premises.
Open a defensible decision and next check
Hold operational approval. Reconcile the source versions and coverage with Omar, the case authority; validate the proposed measurement and reaction; resolve the workload without silently reducing protection. Keep planned checks distinct from performed results. The course teaches how to reach and document that decision.
FMEA and Control Plans
One linked pack you can take to review.
Output 1
Scope, sources and process-flow record
The drawing owns the limit. A later worksheet cannot silently replace it.
Output 2
Failure-mode, effect and cause register
Oversize bore → loose insert/customer assembly interruption → missed wear compensation.
Output 3
Rating basis and action-decision record
Under fictional T1, S4/O1/D5 escalates despite RPN20 being less than36.
Output 4
Linked Control Plan and reaction draft
240 seconds/hour of proposed work does not fit180 seconds/hour.
Output 5
Implementation and effectiveness record
6/600=1.0%;1/400=0.25%. This observed difference is not isolated causal proof.
Output 6
Revision, review and handover pack
A revised instruction cannot approve itself or silently change the Control Plan.
Six downloadable CSV worksheets match the six Course Hub record structures. They are original QMS working drafts, not official AIAG/SAE/IAQG forms. Use authorized, minimized workplace facts and the actual governing method.
FMEA and Control Plans
Six modules, built around useful decisions.
Module 1
Define the process and its authority
Begin with the source, not a blank rating cell. Build: Scope, sources and process-flow record.
Module 2
Build a credible failure chain
Write the chain so somebody can challenge it. Build: Failure-mode, effect and cause register.
Module 3
Evaluate controls and rating evidence
A score needs a definition and a basis. Build: Rating basis and action-decision record.
Module 4
Turn the analysis into an executable plan
A control has to survive a real shift. Build: Linked Control Plan and reaction draft.
Module 5
Verify implementation and effectiveness
Keep planned, installed, verified and effective separate. Build: Implementation and effectiveness record.
Module 6
Review changes and hand over the decision
Review the linked system after a change or escape. Build: Revision, review and handover pack.
Plan about six hours for lessons, practice and independent work. This is a planning estimate, not measured learner completion time. Thirty lab activities and six required coached reflections ask you to decide, calculate, investigate and produce usable records.
FMEA and Control Plans
Situation → example → decision → feedback → output → reflection.
Practice with support
Seven original explainers use synthetic narration, captions and transcripts. Worked contrasts, source records, arithmetic and usable feedback make you examine the decision. Coach Q is an AI quality and compliance colleague that helps you challenge a draft using the permitted evidence.
Keep independent work independent
Fresh cases, two decision banks and three distinct 30-question exam versions use separate records. Coach Q provides navigation only during independent work; document drafting is restricted. The final exam has 30 questions, with24/30 required to pass, three attempts and a 24-hour wait after a failed attempt. There is no countdown. Complete all 30 labs and six required reflections before the exam.
Course Hub supports documents, a study plan, focus logs and planned/actual application records. A saved plan or draft is not evidence of completed workplace work. Human marking uses the disclosed criteria. No independent specialist endorsement or measured learner result is claimed.
FMEA and Control Plans
Read the assessment and service boundaries.
Human assessment
The rubric covers scope/traceability, failure/control reasoning, numeric basis, executable plan/verification and handover. Pass the case at16/20 and the six decisions at10/12, with no unresolved critical error. A justified hold can earn full credit. Will Trikha marks the independent case and decision reasoning. Feedback and another case attempt are included when revision is required. Three case versions rotate, so a later attempt may reuse a version. No fixed review turnaround is promised; contact Will before enrolling if you have a deadline.
Access and Coach Q
Use requires named learner access in the Academy. Lifetime access to the purchased lessons with no recurring subscription. Coach Q currently permits40 requests per rolling24 hours; Hub AI drafting permits15 calls per hour. AI availability can vary. Manual records and worksheets remain available; AI outputs are working drafts. Contact support@qmslearning.com for access or service help. An assessed completion record does not grant product release, risk acceptance or restart authority.
Purchase and refund terms
Request a course-purchase refund within three days of purchase; a refund ends course access, or all seats in the refunded pack. See the refund policy. Purchases of five or more seats on one checkout receive the Academy’s10% team discount. Use the quote route for PO or other agreed terms. After three failed exam attempts, contact support for an individual review of reopening; another attempt is not automatic. No guarantee, accreditation, testimonial or learner result is claimed.
FMEA and Control Plans
Bring your manager a concrete request.
Request a team quote / discuss PO requirements
Quote/PO terms require an actual agreement. No purchase order is accepted merely by using this link.
FMEA and Control Plans
Review the included package, then its price.
These are QMS-assigned component values, not separate selling prices, former prices, verified market values or customer savings. These are illustrative assigned values for this included package.
01
Six-module decision course
Thirty meaningful lab activities and six coached reflections; assigned for the coherent instructional sequence, not a standalone selling price.
US$189
02
Six reusable worksheets
Matched draft structures for the six workplace outputs; assumes final QA, not official sector templates.
US$69
03
Fictional source pack and worked contrasts
Original traceable records, disclosed method, failure/control evidence and realistic operating conflicts.
US$59
04
Course Hub record workflow
Manual records plus permitted AI drafting, planning, focus and application workflow; no separate software subscription value asserted.
US$79
05
Seven captioned explainers and transcripts
Original diagrams and synthetic-narrated media with accessible text; no claim of measured learning benefit.
US$39
06
Independent assessment and human review
Fresh cases, two decision banks and 90 private exam items; human marking follows the disclosed assessment and review terms above.
US$139
Total assigned component value US$574
Assigned values do not establish market value or customer savings. The course price covers the general manufacturing scope and included service described above.
Course price per named learner
US$149One named learner. Any applicable tax appears at checkout.
FMEA and Control Plans
Questions before enrolling.
Does this qualify us to a sector standard?
No. This core teaches manufacturing reasoning and original drafts. Real contracts, current licensed methods, customer requirements and qualified human authority remain necessary.
Do I need FMEA software?
No special FMEA package is required. Worksheets are CSV; Course Hub provides editable records. Use the format and tool your workplace authorizes.
Why not ask an AI to fill the sheet?
The learning work is judging evidence, consequences, controls, capacity and authority. AI can draft text; it cannot establish missing facts, perform the physical challenge or approve the process.
Is a hold a failed assessment?
A justified hold is correct when it identifies the supplied material gap and next authorized action. Inventing facts or approval is not a way to earn a pass.
Are workplace results proven?
No. Technical checks and synthetic fixtures do not establish actual learner transfer or defect reduction. An assessed completion record confirms course requirements, not operational authority or a sector qualification.
Can I take a free lesson or buy for a team?
The real verified-email first lesson is linked above. It opens lesson1 only; further lessons and assessment require enrollment. Use the team-training route for an agreed quote or PO process.
FMEA and Control Plans
Source-bounded teaching.
NASA’s public Goddard FMECA handbook supports general source/ground-rule/evidence/monitoring concepts in its own scope. ASQ provides general FMEA context. Publisher pages establish sector boundaries. Original QMS cases and T1 do not claim to reproduce official tables.
NASA GSFC-HDBK-8004 · ASQ FMEA · IAQG SCMH · AIAG Control Plan context
FMEA and Control Plans
Leave with a decision your team can examine.
Trace the requirement. Explain the failure and controls. Reconcile capacity and reaction. Distinguish actual evidence from plans. Hand over the six-record draft with an honest review, revision or hold recommendation.
Try the first lesson.
Use the actual lesson before enrolling. The Academy requires your full name, email and phone, then email verification. Your verified preview opens the first lesson only.
Does the control actually fit the process?
Guided source review and a practice decision · Saves in this browser · No card